By: Kiya Yohannes

---

On Wednesday morning, a 37-year-old mother, Renee Nicole Good, was shot and killed at the hands of a federal ICE agent. Federal reports coming from the White House, as well as President Trump via social media, state that the incident was an act of self-defense, while local officials like Mayor Frey and Governor Walz dispute such claims. Multiple eyewitnesses have stated that Renee was attempting to flee the scene when the agent opened fire on her, once through her front windshield and twice more through her driver’s side window. The conflicting reports have now led to the FBI officially taking over the investigation. Renee was not the first victim of such violence, nor the last. Today, two more people were shot in Portland, Oregon, by federal agents. These shootings have sparked public outrage and protests all across the country, demanding law enforcement accountability.

---

Articles to REFERENCE:

Two starkly opposed Americas laid bare by deadly ICE shooting:

• https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93vny222geo

Who was Renee Nicole Good, the woman killed by ICE?

• https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1jepdjy256o

Watch: Eyewitnesses recount deadly ICE shooting

ICE agent Jonathan Ross confirmed as the shooter of Renee Good | MPR News

Minnesota and federal officials are no longer cooperating on ICE shooting investigation : NPR

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

Texas Tech University is making headlines after rolling out new rules that change how professors can teach about race, gender, sexual orientation, and identity. According to the new policy, if a class wants to cover topics related to race or gender, or even show course materials that touch on those issues, the professor now has to submit everything for approval. That approval does not just stay in the department either. It can go all the way up to the university system’s Board of Regents. On top of that, the memo lays out a list of restricted ideas, including things like teaching that there are more than two sexes or that meritocracy is racist or that people are inherently racist or sexist because of their identity. That has caused a lot of concern on campus. Some professors say they have already had to change or cancel class plans because they are unsure what will be allowed. Others feel like this is crossing into censorship and hurting academic freedom. Students, especially LGBTQ students and those who care about social issues, are worried that this will shut down open conversation and make classrooms less welcoming. In short, subjects that used to be normal in humanities and social science courses may now be watered down, delayed, or blocked entirely if they do not pass the new review system. This matters because it changes the way education works. When course content has to satisfy administrators or political appointees instead of academic experts, classes can start to feel safer on the surface but lose depth and honesty. Students who rely on representation in the classroom might also find fewer spaces where their identity or experiences are taken seriously. Professors may choose to avoid certain subjects to stay out of trouble, which can make the entire university feel less open to real discussion. And since other states are watching these kinds of policies closely, Texas Tech might end up influencing what happens at other colleges too. The overall reaction from faculty and students makes it clear that this is not just a classroom issue but a much bigger conversation about academic freedom, inclusion, and what universities are supposed to be for.

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

The 2025 UN Climate Summit wrapped up this week, and even though these meetings usually get a mix of excitement and eye rolls, this one actually felt a little different. Leaders from around the world showed up with a sense of urgency that has not always been there in past years. And honestly, with record heat, extreme storms, and wildfires becoming the new normal, it was about time.

One of the biggest focuses this year was money, specifically who is paying for what. Developing countries have been asking wealthier nations for years to step up and help fund climate adaptation, since they are often the ones hit hardest even though they contribute the least to global emissions. At this summit, countries agreed to expand funding for climate resilience projects, like building safer infrastructure and protecting vulnerable communities. It is not a perfect solution, but it is a step forward.

Another major topic was cutting emissions faster. Several countries updated their climate goals, promising bigger reductions by the early 2030s. Some nations rolled out new plans for renewable energy, electric transportation, or limiting the use of fossil fuels. The big question, as always, is whether these promises turn into real action or just stay on paper.

The summit also highlighted the growing role of young people and activists in pushing climate policy. From protests outside the venue to students speaking on panels inside, the message was clear: people want accountability, and they are not afraid to call out leaders who drag their feet.

In the end, the 2025 summit did not magically fix the climate crisis, but it did show a stronger global push toward real action. Whether the world actually follows through is something we will all be watching, especially since the next decade is make or break for the planet.

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

Last month, people at the University of Oklahoma were shocked when Dr. Vahid Abedini, an assistant professor of Iranian and Middle Eastern Studies, was arrested by federal immigration agents while boarding a plane at Will Rogers International Airport. Dr. Abedini had a valid H1B visa, which should have allowed him to live and work in the United States without issues.

He was on his way to an academic conference when he was detained. The news spread quickly on campus, and students and coworkers were stunned. Many said he had already become a respected and well liked part of the department.

Three days later, Dr. Abedini was released from ICE custody, which brought a lot of relief. Still, the whole situation left people uneasy. It showed how vulnerable international scholars can be, even when they have the correct paperwork and follow every rule.

Dr. Abedini had done everything by the book, yet he was still detained. His experience makes it clear that even visa holders are not always safe from unexpected immigration actions. It also shows how uncertain and stressful the immigration system has become for scholars, no matter their academic achievements or support from their university.

Universities like OU rely on international faculty to bring new ideas and perspectives, especially in areas like Middle Eastern studies. An incident like this, where a professor is detained while traveling for normal academic reasons, raises real concerns about whether foreign born educators can count on stable and safe working conditions. It may also discourage future scholars from taking jobs in the U.S. or make them more cautious.

The strong support Dr. Abedini received from students, coworkers, and the broader academic community shows how much he mattered to the campus. But it also brings up a bigger issue. Schools and institutions need to think about how they can better protect international faculty from sudden disruptions. When any international scholar can be detained without warning, it shows the need for clearer protections, more transparency, and stronger advocacy.

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

The University of Oklahoma is getting a lot of attention right now because religious beliefs, class expectations, and campus rules are all bumping into each other. The situation started when a psychology student got a zero on an assignment after she quoted the Bible and argued, based on her Christian faith, that gender is only male and female and that believing in more than two genders is “demonic.”

The assignment asked students to respond to a research article about gender norms and social dynamics in teenagers. The grader, who is a graduate student instructor, said the student’s response did not work as an academic answer because it did not use evidence and it did not address the actual questions from the reading.

The student disagreed and said the grade was not about her writing or research at all. She filed a complaint saying she was being discriminated against for her religious beliefs.

After that, the university put the instructor on administrative leave and opened an investigation. School officials said the zero will not affect the student’s final grade, and they stressed that OU supports religious expression and free speech.

At the same time, research about religion is still happening across the university. Professors in fields like sociology are studying how religion shapes American life, faith communities, and social change.

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

On July 24, 2025, Glass Lewis and ISS, two major companies that advise investors on how to vote in corporate elections, sued the State of Texas over a new law. This law would make it harder for them to give advice on topics like diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and environmental or social issues (ESG). Texas wanted these companies to add special warnings whenever they talked about anything the state considered “nonfinancial,” and they would have to prove how those recommendations made financial sense.

Glass Lewis and ISS argued that this violates their freedom of speech. They said the government can’t force them to label their own advice in a negative way or push them to talk about things only from the state’s point of view. They also said the law could scare companies away from giving honest advice about DEI and ESG topics, which many investors care about.

If the law had gone into effect, it might have changed how companies and investors make decisions. People might get less information about things like board diversity, worker treatment, climate impact, and other social issues. Companies could also feel less pressure to be responsible in these areas.

But at the end of August 2025, a federal judge stepped in and blocked Texas from enforcing the law, at least for now. The judge said the law likely violates the First Amendment and unfairly targets certain viewpoints. This means Glass Lewis and ISS can keep giving their usual advice without adding state-required warnings.

For investors, the judge’s decision means they can still get full, honest information about both financial and social issues. For companies, it means DEI and ESG topics won’t suddenly disappear from shareholder discussions. And for Texas, this lawsuit is a big test of how far states can go when trying to limit conversations about diversity and social responsibility in business.

In the end, this case is about more than just one law. It represents a bigger debate happening across the country about whether companies should care only about profits or also pay attention to fairness, sustainability, and how they impact people. The judge’s ruling is a temporary win for those who believe these topics matter, but the final decision in 2026 will shape how DEI and ESG are handled in the future — not just in Texas, but everywhere.

By: Emily Hill, December 8, 2025

Zohran Mamdani winning the 2025 NYC mayoral race is a big deal, and not just because he’s young. At 34, he’s the youngest mayor the city has had in a long time, and the first Muslim and South Asian heritage mayor in NYC. For a lot of people, his win feels like the city finally reflecting the communities that actually live here.

His campaign was very different from the usual New York political machine. It was powered by volunteers, young people, and everyday New Yorkers who felt ignored by past leaders. A lot of people said it was one of the strongest grassroots campaigns the city’s ever seen. It showed that you don’t need to be backed by the political establishment to win if you can get real people on your side.

Mamdani’s platform focused on issues almost everyone in the city feels: rent is too high, commuting is expensive, wages don’t match the cost of living, and basic necessities keep getting pricier. Ideas like rent freezes, expanding affordable housing, free buses, raising the minimum wage, and even city-owned grocery stores got attention because they speak to what people are struggling with every day.

But beyond the policies, his win means something bigger. For immigrants, working-class families, and younger voters, it feels like someone who understands their reality is finally in charge. His story makes people believe that leadership in New York doesn’t have to look one specific way.

Nationally, his win is already making waves. Progressives see it as proof that grassroots organizing still works, and that candidates who aren’t “typical politicians” can actually win major races. It challenges the old idea of who’s “electable.”

Of course, he has huge challenges ahead. Running NYC isn’t easy, and not every promise will be simple to deliver. But even with doubts, a lot of New Yorkers feel hopeful for the first time in a while.

Mamdani’s win is more than a political headline — it feels like a shift. It shows people that change is still possible and that the future of the city might actually include the voices of the people who live in it.

By: Jayla Moore, December 8. 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal in a controversial case from Llano County,

Texas, leaving in place a ruling that allows the removal of 17 books from public libraries- many

of which explore themes of race, gender, sexuality, identity, and belonging.

The dispute began when local officials and some residents requested that certain titles be

removed from the public library shelves. The targeted books included titles dealing with race,

LGBTQ+ identity, puberty and body issues, and other subjects often marginalized or stigmatized

(including youth‑oriented and children’s books).

In 2023, a federal court ordered the books be returned. But in May 2025, the Fifth U.S. Circuit

Court of Appeals overturned that ruling in a 10–7 decision. The Court held that public libraries

are not legally required to maintain any particular set of books- patrons do not have a

constitutional “right to receive information” in the form of taxpayer-funded library holdings.

Removing books, the court said, does not constitute a ban under the First Amendment, because

the materials remain available through other means.

With the Supreme Court declining to review the case, the appeals court’s decision stands giving

local governments and library boards wide latitude to remove books based on content or

viewpoint.

Public libraries serve as vital spaces for learning, exploration, and inclusion. When books that

reflect marginalized identities or difficult topics are removed, it limits access to diverse

perspectives and sends a message that certain voices are less valued or welcome. This is

particularly significant for young people, who may rely on these resources to see their identities

reflected and to understand the experiences of others.

As public institutions relinquish their responsibility to maintain inclusive collections, the burden

falls on communities and individuals to speak up, support representation, and safeguard spaces

of belonging. Equity and inclusion are not only about access to services—they are also about

who gets to be seen, whose stories are told, and whose voices matter.

Source:

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-texas-book-ban-605b45226dd6c98379fc0df706598098

By: Jayla Moore, December 8, 2025

Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Loudoun County

School Board in Virginia. The suit argues the district’s policy allowing transgender students to

use locker rooms matching their gender identity violates the constitutional and First Amendment

rights of other students.

When inclusive policies are challenged, it threatens to roll back not just access to facilities, but

also the implicit promise of dignity, safety, and equity that schools are meant to afford every

student. For transgender and gender‑diverse youth, they are already facing heightened risk of

bullying, isolation, mental health struggles, and more.

The lawsuit underscores a troubling national trend: institutions and policymakers increasingly

contest whether gender identity accommodations in schools are lawful or safe. For many

students, especially transgender and gender‑diverse youth, these policies are not abstract ideas-

they are about dignity, belonging, and day‑to‑day safety. When access to affirming facilities or

inclusive policies is challenged, it threatens more than comfort- it erodes trust and undermines

inclusive school climates.

This legal battle prompted reflection and conversation:

●

●

●

Are we doing enough to support gender‑diverse students’ rights and well‑being?

How do we ensure that institutional policies foster inclusion, safety, and respect for all

identities, even in the face of legal or political pressure?

What structures or resources can we strengthen to protect identity‑affirming spaces if the

larger landscape becomes more hostile?

This moment is a reminder that equity and inclusion require active attention and ongoing

commitment. Legal and political challenges may shape the broader landscape, but our

responsibility is to continue fostering an environment where every student can thrive.

Source:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-department-sues-virginia-school-board-ove

r-transgender-use-locker-2025-12-09/

By: Jasmine Weng, December 8, 2025

The media reports that the University of Oklahoma has placed a graduate-level instructor on administrative leave after a student’s essay, which rejected the concept of multiple genders on Biblical grounds,  was graded as failing and triggered a formal complaint of religious discrimination. 

• Most notably, the student’s essay described belief in multiple genders as “demonic,” citing the Bible, and was given a zero by the instructor, not for the student’s beliefs per se, but because the paper did not meet the academic requirements of the assignment. The assignment required a 650-word response to a psychological study about gender norms and peer relations; the instructor judged that the essay relied on personal ideology rather than empirical evidence, failed to respond to the prompt meaningfully, and used language many found offensive. 

• At the same time, the response to this grading decision has escalated into a broader institutional and political controversy over academic freedom, religious expression, and the treatment of gender identity on campus. The student filed a discrimination complaint. The university stated that the zero would not count toward her final grade, and initiated an investigation. Meanwhile, the instructor was placed on leave pending the outcome, a move sparking debate about fairness, rights, and institutional accountability. 

• The incident is emblematic of deeper tensions in higher education over DEI, gender identity, and who gets to define acceptable discourse. As administrative actions, including placing the instructor on leave, unfold under pressure from political and social forces, the case underscores how campus policies and academic judgments may be influenced by external cultural battles, rather than solely educational standards or student welfare.

• From a justice and equity standpoint, the consequences may erode trust and safety for marginalized communities on campus. Instructors and students who are transgender or support gender diversity, or who wish to engage openly in gender-identity topics, may feel vulnerable, especially if academic evaluation and employment can be contested under religious or ideological grievances.

• Even from a pedagogical integrity lens, the controversy raises serious questions about academic standards, bias, and consistency. Evaluating academic work fairly, based on evidence, engagement with the prompt, and respectful discourse, is essential for a diverse and inclusive educational environment. When ideological or religious objections are brought into conflict with academic norms, institutions risk undermining both fairness and inclusion.

In sum, this is not just about a single failing grade or a student complaint. It’s about how beliefs, institutional policies, and contested identities collide in the classroom. The resolution of this case will reverberate far beyond OU, touching on academic freedom, religious expression, gender justice, and the right to learn and teach without fear of retribution.

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5634703-oklahoma-instructor-leave-gender-identity/